IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THE SMR REVIEW PROCESS

IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RELEVANT TO THE SMR REVIEW PROCESS

A comprehensive database of documents relevant to the SMR review process, including documents submitted by the Secretariat, responses by Member States, and other submissions is available at the UNODC website. Below you will find links to some of the most relevant documents:

  • A comprehensive database of documents relevant to the SMR review process, including documents submitted by the Secretariat, responses by Member States, and other submissions is available at the UNODC website.  Below you will find links to some of the most relevant documents:
  • The UN Secretariat ‘s Working Paper to be presented at the third Expert Group Meeting in Brasilia, Brazil between January 28 – 31, 2014. The Working Paper consists of the current version of the Standard Minimum Rules, as well as proposals for revision submitted by Member States and the intergovernmental Expert Group.
  • ECOSOC Resolution 2013/35 adopted on 25 July 2013 recommending that the General Assembly extend the mandate of the intergovernmental Expert Group with a view to reporting to the twenty-third session of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice in 2014, and inviting Member States to participate in the third Expert Group Meeting.
  • Report on the second meeting of the Expert Group on the SMRs held in Buenos Aires from 11 to 13 December 2012, submitted to the twenty-second session of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.
  • UN General Assembly Resolution 67/188 adopted on  December 20, 2012 authorizing the inter-governmental Expert Group to continue its work on the revision of the SMRs with a view to reporting on its progress to the twenty-second session of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.
  • Summary of discussions from the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’s Working Group on the SMRs presented at the second Expert Group Meeting in December 2012.
  • The UN Secretariat’s Working Paper presented at the second Expert Group Meeting in December 2012.
  • ECOSOC Resolution 2012/13 adopted on August 10, 2012 recommending to the General Assembly the adoption of a draft resolution regarding the revision of the SMRs.
  • The Detention, Rights and Social Justice Programme at the University of Essex and Penal Reform International convened an independent expert meeting on in the SMR reform process October 2012 and submitted  a Summary of the meeting and its recommendations to the second Expert Group meeting in December 2012.
  • Report on the first meeting of the Expert Group on the SMRs held in Vienna from January 31 to February 2, 2012, which identifies a proposed list of targeted revisions. The report was submitted to the twenty-first session of the Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice.
  • The UN Secretariat’s Working Paper presented at the first Expert Group Meeting in February 2012.

Latest news on the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners!

“Mandela Rules” Passed, Standards on the Treatment of Prisoners Enhanced for the 21st Century

“Mandela Rules” Passed, Standards on the Treatment of Prisoners Enhanced for the 21st Century

Last week saw the welcome passage of a landmark resolution at the recent Vienna Crime Congress endorsing the revised Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (SMR). The revised standards will be known as the “Mandela Rules” in honor of the legacy of the late South African President. As the primary international standards relating to treatment in detention, the updated Rules expressly emphasize the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment and the fact that prisoners must be protected from such practices and treated with respect due to their inherent dignity and value as human beings. The Rules also impose substantial limitations on the use of prolonged and prolonged solitary solitary confinement. In a statement prior to the start of the Vienna Crime Congress, Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan E. Mendez called for the adoption of the Mandela Rules, saying that their adoption and prospective implementation “reinforces human rights principles and provides greater protection for persons deprived of their liberty, updated procedural safeguards, and more effective guidance to national prison administrations.” To learn more about the Special Rapporteur and the ATI’s involvement in the SMR revision process, visit our page dedicated to this topic.

UN expert calls for adoption of a minimum set of fundamental human rights for those in detention

UN expert calls for adoption of a minimum set of fundamental human rights for those in detention

May 18, 2015 – Today, United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture Juan E. Méndez called for the adoption of the revised Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, proposed for adoption as the “Mandela Rules,” in an open letter to the UN Commission on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. The Rules are being considered by the 24th session Commission this week in Vienna, and the adoption of a Resolution on the Rules this week will enable the Rules to proceed forward and be considered by the UN General Assembly in December 2015. The revised Rules contain a number of practical elements that provide detainees with increased protection from torture and other ill-treatment, such as a specific prohibition on the use of prolonged solitary confinement, which is defined as that exceeding 15 days. “The time is now to adopt the revised Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners; anything less would send a negative signal to the international community,” the Special Rapporteur stated. “The adoption and implementation of these rules reinforces human rights principles and provides greater protection for persons deprived of their liberty, updated procedural safeguards, and more effective guidance to national prison administrations,” he explained. The revised Rules also include key safeguards such as the recognition of the absolute prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; and requirements for independent healthcare professionals who have a duty to refrain from participating in torture or other ill-treatment, and have a vital role in detecting such ill-treatment and reporting it. However, the Special Rapporteur warned that “[r]egrettably, there is a lack of guidance on the use of force in the revised Rules which gives rise to the risk that excessive force may be used by prison guards and which, under appropriate circumstances, constitutes cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.” In addition, he noted that the proposed naming of the Mandela Rules would serve to “honour the great Statesman and inspirational leader who served many years in prison in the name of freedom and democracy, by ensuring that all those deprived of their liberty are guaranteed a minimum set of fundamental human rights.” You can read the press release and open letter in full on the OHCHR website.